There is a rogue form of IT that lurks in the shadows of big organizations. Shadow IT crept into the frustrating information system of companies to make it less troublesome for the employees.
It operates in the dark to further the employees’ effectiveness in their roles by giving teams the tools they need outside of centralized IT for them to do their jobs as best as possible.
There’s a story behind how this rogue IT came about, how it has magnified over time, and how despite its drawbacks, it has many upsides as well.
Continue reading this blog to see how a lurker in the shadows is also a friendly neighbourhood helper.
There was once a time, many years ago, when a company’s employees were highly dependent on their IT department. The technology that was disseminated to the users is what they accepted as theirs.
It essentially worked as: innovation in the market + IT department = technology for the enterprise.
For example, typically a company worked like this:
In the meantime, a new trend was being set in the market. As the 2000s arrived, the internet was massively adopted as the new norm, new technology came into the market that allowed the outside and the inside to merge.
Along with this, the users were becoming more and more tech-savvy with each passing day and this is what marked the advent of Shadow IT.
This liberty to handle challenges on their own without dependency on the relatively slower IT processes made the employees feel empowered enough to take matters into their own hands.
Basically, they used the internet. And easily accessible external hardware, such as flash drives.
In the midst of this independent working, the employees failed to mention the nitty-gritties to the IT department; and did not fathom the fact that their unsupervised actions came with consequences.
This innovation was given the tag of “Shadow IT.”
Shadows hide the composition of things making them visible but at the same time, unseen. These lurking shadows threatened the company’s IT because they were being kept in the dark. They simply did not know what was going on in aspects that were related to their department.
To the employees, these cloud services were very useful. It helped avoiding time-consuming tasks, increased reactivity, and hence, productivity.
To the IT department, however, they looked at it as a threat to data security and an undoing of their hard work to secure the tech of the company. This was simply because the softwares and devices that were able to access the data of the company was unknown.
Moreover, how was IT supposed to figure out which ones were leaking the company’s system to outsiders? How were they supposed to deal with the viruses entering the company’s systems from the employees’ external hardware?
The new reality was that the employees solutions were creating problems for IT.
Now, with most people being extremely tech-savvy; Shadow IT has not only increased but has also been accepted. It is looked at as an innovative force rather than a troublemaker.
It has helped employees with boosting their productivity and performing well for their personal professional growth and the development of the company as a whole as well. It is all very meta and cannot be looked at as a threat anymore.
The business environment today is extremely competitive and dynamic. Older processes are too slow for employees to do their best.
Also, it is but obvious that the people interacting with the market directly will have a good understanding of what technology is good and what just doesn’t cut it. Business experience can sometimes trump over technological knowledge in understanding innovation culture.
Now that you have a rough idea of how Shadow IT is beneficial, it is important to know the drawbacks of it so as to minimize its ill effects on the company i.e. manage it in the best possible way.
The job of IT is essentially to govern the technology and data of the company. If they do not know what is going on within Shadow IT, they are not in control. As a result, risks increase.
The more applications and softwares in the company, the more risk. How can IT monitor and protect every single application provider that is brought in?
Securing the infrastructure is not enough to make sure every vulnerability gap is closed. There will simply be too many hidden openings into the company’s system.
There is a risk of operations, dependency on vendors, market fluctuations, crowds, and saturations. It is too difficult to manage technology when so much time and effort is used for something that may or may not even last for a long span of time.
With more and more applications in the company, there are more places for data to exist. This information everywhere is difficult to keep track of.
What cannot be assimilated together makes it difficult to leverage the best use of it. The meaningfulness and utility of the information are harder to decipher and utilize.
Imagine this. One department in the organization is on Skype, another on Google Hangouts, and another on Zoom. All three departments have tasks spread across them.
People are talking but there is no commonplace (which mind you, is a bare minimum requirement) where collaboration can be facilitated. As a result, a collaboration between teams is hampered in the organization.
By focusing on so many different aspects, too many details create confusion and lots of time to sort that out. There is a need to objectively measure the technology’s usefulness in the company.
If three departments have used three different platforms for their solutions to the same problem in context to their work, wouldn’t it be extremely tough to assimilate everything into one report to overview it entirely?
Shadow IT is a small part of a much larger concern. Employees know that these tools can be risky, they use it anyway because ultimately, it does aid in their productivity and is honestly just really convenient for their work processes.
The organization’s goals are supposed to be achieved in the end. There’s a bigger picture aspect to it.
Would you just smile and pay for a few licenses to solve an issue or ask a backlogged IT team to create a customized solution with a large amount of data with very many intricacies?
But since Shadow IT exists because there is a demand for new technology that keeps up with the fickle and dynamically changing market; and because rigid technologies are highly unappreciated by employees who look for task-specific customizable tools to aid their workflows, another solution is considering the use of no-code platforms.
No-Code platforms are application builders that have simple visual interfaces to aid a user to integrate it with other programs in whatever way they desire. It is customizable and enables solution development much quicker than any other means.
Applications are made by citizen developers to aid the company’s work processes. This builds the speed, agility as well as security of the enterprise.
IT backlog is the reason that employees look elsewhere for help. It is not possible for IT to meet every single need and demand of the employees in the business, it’s just not feasible.
Shadow IT around no-code is avoided as it allows developers to economically and quickly create applications. There is no more waiting for development.
There is so much flexibility and immediacy with which changes can be made that the Shadow IT dependency decreases significantly.
The business has come a long way in all these years. Shadow IT cannot be removed from the picture but can definitely be managed well by employing no-code platforms in the businesses and gaining some sort of control over processes.
Quixy is a no-code platform that can aid in making shadow IT inconvenient. Its drag and drop system enables the custom building of applications as well as the safety and security of data, all in one place for the company’s employees.
If you want to begin managing Shadow IT, contact us for our free trial!
AMA Session with Gautam (Founder & CEO) and Ramesh Kenche (Product Manager)